<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Epiphanies of a Common Man</title>
	<atom:link href="http://epiphaniesofacommonman.com/blog/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://epiphaniesofacommonman.com/blog</link>
	<description>Finding Christ in the Mundane</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 21:18:41 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on What Youth Ministry Isn&#8217;t by Haggis</title>
		<link>http://epiphaniesofacommonman.com/blog/archives/114/comment-page-1#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator>Haggis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 21:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://epiphaniesofacommonman.com/blog/?p=114#comment-338</guid>
		<description>I struggle some with the format that the church as a whole has in ministering to kids.  They segregate them all into different grade levels, take them away from their parents, and teach them dumbed down lessons (the book I used this last sunday for the 5 year olds at my church had a message I was supposed to read that summed up the Lord&#039;s Prayer as &quot;Dear God, thanks for good food.  Help me to be good. Amen.&quot;  

Much of that is unbiblical.  Not necesarily bad - once in a while kids hanging out with other kids who are their own age can be ok, but this should not be the norm for learning, but we the church have followed the culture.  The idea of segregating kids into age groups for instruction comes from the culture, and not from the word, yet we do it.  I get the impression that kids who hang out with older kids become more mature, and kids who hang out with younger kids learn how to be leaders.  Kids who hang out with kids their own age learn to goof off.  

So I am pretty much in agreement with your response.  The church is supposed to be directing kids to their parents for instruction.  THAT is the precedent for youth ministry.  But with the parents and fathers in particularly so anemic scripturally, that would typically amount to an epic Phail.  Thus, instead, we pay a youth pastor to teach our kids for us.  Sad state of affairs.  How do we fix it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I struggle some with the format that the church as a whole has in ministering to kids.  They segregate them all into different grade levels, take them away from their parents, and teach them dumbed down lessons (the book I used this last sunday for the 5 year olds at my church had a message I was supposed to read that summed up the Lord&#8217;s Prayer as &#8220;Dear God, thanks for good food.  Help me to be good. Amen.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Much of that is unbiblical.  Not necesarily bad &#8211; once in a while kids hanging out with other kids who are their own age can be ok, but this should not be the norm for learning, but we the church have followed the culture.  The idea of segregating kids into age groups for instruction comes from the culture, and not from the word, yet we do it.  I get the impression that kids who hang out with older kids become more mature, and kids who hang out with younger kids learn how to be leaders.  Kids who hang out with kids their own age learn to goof off.  </p>
<p>So I am pretty much in agreement with your response.  The church is supposed to be directing kids to their parents for instruction.  THAT is the precedent for youth ministry.  But with the parents and fathers in particularly so anemic scripturally, that would typically amount to an epic Phail.  Thus, instead, we pay a youth pastor to teach our kids for us.  Sad state of affairs.  How do we fix it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What Youth Ministry Isn&#8217;t by admin</title>
		<link>http://epiphaniesofacommonman.com/blog/archives/114/comment-page-1#comment-335</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 02:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://epiphaniesofacommonman.com/blog/?p=114#comment-335</guid>
		<description>First of all thanks for your post, it is great to discuss such topics. Secondly, yes there most certainly is a precedent for youth ministry in the Bible. What I attest to on the matter is not necessarily given in the article, as it is largely negative about what it isn’t, so let me give a few passages that show what it is.  

&quot;Whoever spares the rod hates his son, but he who loves him is diligent to discipline him.&quot; (Proverbs 13:24)

&quot;Train up a child in the way he should go; even when he is old he will not depart from it.&quot; (Proverbs 22:6)

&quot;You shall therefore lay up these words of mine in your heart and in your soul, and you shall bind them as a sign on your hand, and they shall be as frontlets between your eyes. You shall teach them to your children, talking of them when you are sitting in your house, and when you are walking by the way, and when you lie down, and when you rise.&quot; (Deuteronomy 11:18-19)

&quot;Fathers, do not provoke your children to anger, but bring them up in the discipline and instruction of the Lord.&quot;  (Ephesians 6:4)

Ministry is about discipleship and that is exactly what all parents are commanded to do in raising their children.  When I teach my daughter who she is supposed to be and who God is I am performing youth ministry, which is simply ministry to young people. The most direct responsibility to minister to young people are parents to children and God has given the responsibility to them. If parents are not ministering to their own children then any sort of “youth ministry” is at best handicapped, and at worst harmful. This is not to say that the church has no part in the discipleship of young people however, for we are commanded…

&quot;Older women likewise are to be reverent in behavior, not slanderers or slaves to much wine. They are to teach what is good, and so train the young women to love their husbands and children, to be self-controlled, pure, working at home, kind, and submissive to their own husbands, that the word of God may not be reviled. Likewise, urge the younger men to be self-controlled.&quot; (Titus 2:3-6)

The older Christians train the younger in how they should live, this is not against parents but alongside them and supporting them. This also does not stop at adulthood, for it is not “the adults teach the kids” it is simply the “older teach the younger” and where you fall on that spectrum should dictate your position. The short summary of my view is, parents have the primary responsibility to minister to their own children in discipleship and the church must also come along side them to train the younger by the older. Hope that clarifies a bit, and I welcome any feedback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all thanks for your post, it is great to discuss such topics. Secondly, yes there most certainly is a precedent for youth ministry in the Bible. What I attest to on the matter is not necessarily given in the article, as it is largely negative about what it isn’t, so let me give a few passages that show what it is.  </p>
<p>&#8220;Whoever spares the rod hates his son, but he who loves him is diligent to discipline him.&#8221; (Proverbs 13:24)</p>
<p>&#8220;Train up a child in the way he should go; even when he is old he will not depart from it.&#8221; (Proverbs 22:6)</p>
<p>&#8220;You shall therefore lay up these words of mine in your heart and in your soul, and you shall bind them as a sign on your hand, and they shall be as frontlets between your eyes. You shall teach them to your children, talking of them when you are sitting in your house, and when you are walking by the way, and when you lie down, and when you rise.&#8221; (Deuteronomy 11:18-19)</p>
<p>&#8220;Fathers, do not provoke your children to anger, but bring them up in the discipline and instruction of the Lord.&#8221;  (Ephesians 6:4)</p>
<p>Ministry is about discipleship and that is exactly what all parents are commanded to do in raising their children.  When I teach my daughter who she is supposed to be and who God is I am performing youth ministry, which is simply ministry to young people. The most direct responsibility to minister to young people are parents to children and God has given the responsibility to them. If parents are not ministering to their own children then any sort of “youth ministry” is at best handicapped, and at worst harmful. This is not to say that the church has no part in the discipleship of young people however, for we are commanded…</p>
<p>&#8220;Older women likewise are to be reverent in behavior, not slanderers or slaves to much wine. They are to teach what is good, and so train the young women to love their husbands and children, to be self-controlled, pure, working at home, kind, and submissive to their own husbands, that the word of God may not be reviled. Likewise, urge the younger men to be self-controlled.&#8221; (Titus 2:3-6)</p>
<p>The older Christians train the younger in how they should live, this is not against parents but alongside them and supporting them. This also does not stop at adulthood, for it is not “the adults teach the kids” it is simply the “older teach the younger” and where you fall on that spectrum should dictate your position. The short summary of my view is, parents have the primary responsibility to minister to their own children in discipleship and the church must also come along side them to train the younger by the older. Hope that clarifies a bit, and I welcome any feedback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What Youth Ministry Isn&#8217;t by Haggis</title>
		<link>http://epiphaniesofacommonman.com/blog/archives/114/comment-page-1#comment-334</link>
		<dc:creator>Haggis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://epiphaniesofacommonman.com/blog/?p=114#comment-334</guid>
		<description>I would ask the question:

Is there even a Biblical precident for youth ministry?  If you find one, I&#039;d wager it is very different from the perspective that you describe the church currently engaging in, but surprisingly, it differs from your attestation as well (though i agree more or less).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would ask the question:</p>
<p>Is there even a Biblical precident for youth ministry?  If you find one, I&#8217;d wager it is very different from the perspective that you describe the church currently engaging in, but surprisingly, it differs from your attestation as well (though i agree more or less).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is Heresy? by Rich</title>
		<link>http://epiphaniesofacommonman.com/blog/archives/171/comment-page-1#comment-268</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://epiphaniesofacommonman.com/blog/?p=171#comment-268</guid>
		<description>First, I am sorry that I just now read this post in its entirety. I am definitely guilty of  “casually” throwing around the word heretic in a sinful way. However, I don&#039;t believe that it is enough to say that teaching must simply coincide with the creeds and the vitals of the faith merely in the meanings of the words.  One must go a step further and assert that, the implied hermeneutics must also logically support the creeds. This is what the study of theology is all about. As I am a Calvinist, this is an example of what I see to be one of those situations.
The comparison of Free Will and Total Inability. The Calvinist view of Total Inability states that we are 100% unable to atone for our own sin. Only through the gift of grace freely given through the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ are we saved. Period. The Armenian view of Free Will, however assumes that God has given us the ability to atone for our sins through good works. Salvation is dependent upon man&#039;s decision to choose God. Thus Jesus, died and it&#039;s a crap shoot to see who wants in. Thus Jesus doesn&#039;t know who will choose him. Is he then sovereign? This goes directly against Matthew 11:27. Is Jesus then not who he says he is? 
Hermeneutically speaking, this goes against all the aforementioned creeds and thus falls under the definition given above of Heresy. 
Culturally, we are in a far different state than the Christian community in early Christianity. (ie. Florida…sorry I couldn’t help it).  A pastor or member can easily leave a church and find a new one even within walking distance. There is a veritable buffet of Christian teaching, especially in America, we have the options to choose whatever form of God we like. Ultimately, therein lies the problem.  I can see it on headline news: “PCA brands Pastor Tom of Tampa FL a heretic for…(it doesn’t even matter)…” Everyone would change the channel thinking, “What else is on?” “Consequently, Pastor Tom decides to plant a independent church in Lutz.” There is no cultural use or relevance for the branding of heretics. My point is that Heresy happens regularly due to various things like buffet Christianity, post modernism, modernism, falsely-called teachers, pastors with no spiritual checks, elders serving out of habit or a lack of options, etc, the list goes on. Heresy is casual or flippant part of everyday life in Christianity. However, love the sinner not the sin. But what are we to do about unrepentant sinners and what does Matthew say about that? Perhaps, a conversation for another post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, I am sorry that I just now read this post in its entirety. I am definitely guilty of  “casually” throwing around the word heretic in a sinful way. However, I don&#8217;t believe that it is enough to say that teaching must simply coincide with the creeds and the vitals of the faith merely in the meanings of the words.  One must go a step further and assert that, the implied hermeneutics must also logically support the creeds. This is what the study of theology is all about. As I am a Calvinist, this is an example of what I see to be one of those situations.<br />
The comparison of Free Will and Total Inability. The Calvinist view of Total Inability states that we are 100% unable to atone for our own sin. Only through the gift of grace freely given through the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ are we saved. Period. The Armenian view of Free Will, however assumes that God has given us the ability to atone for our sins through good works. Salvation is dependent upon man&#8217;s decision to choose God. Thus Jesus, died and it&#8217;s a crap shoot to see who wants in. Thus Jesus doesn&#8217;t know who will choose him. Is he then sovereign? This goes directly against Matthew 11:27. Is Jesus then not who he says he is?<br />
Hermeneutically speaking, this goes against all the aforementioned creeds and thus falls under the definition given above of Heresy.<br />
Culturally, we are in a far different state than the Christian community in early Christianity. (ie. Florida…sorry I couldn’t help it).  A pastor or member can easily leave a church and find a new one even within walking distance. There is a veritable buffet of Christian teaching, especially in America, we have the options to choose whatever form of God we like. Ultimately, therein lies the problem.  I can see it on headline news: “PCA brands Pastor Tom of Tampa FL a heretic for…(it doesn’t even matter)…” Everyone would change the channel thinking, “What else is on?” “Consequently, Pastor Tom decides to plant a independent church in Lutz.” There is no cultural use or relevance for the branding of heretics. My point is that Heresy happens regularly due to various things like buffet Christianity, post modernism, modernism, falsely-called teachers, pastors with no spiritual checks, elders serving out of habit or a lack of options, etc, the list goes on. Heresy is casual or flippant part of everyday life in Christianity. However, love the sinner not the sin. But what are we to do about unrepentant sinners and what does Matthew say about that? Perhaps, a conversation for another post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fanfare for the Common Man by Abbie</title>
		<link>http://epiphaniesofacommonman.com/blog/archives/10/comment-page-1#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Abbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://epiphaniesofacommonman.com/blog/?p=10#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Good words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fanfare for the Common Man by Begozegefeday</title>
		<link>http://epiphaniesofacommonman.com/blog/archives/10/comment-page-1#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Begozegefeday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 11:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://epiphaniesofacommonman.com/blog/?p=10#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Hello.
:)  

Martha Louise, who is the only daughter of King Harald and Queen Sonja, gave up the title of &#039;royal highness&#039; upon her 2002 marriage to writer Ari, and has a reputation for not standing on ceremony.
  Bye.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello.<br />
 <img src='http://epiphaniesofacommonman.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   </p>
<p>Martha Louise, who is the only daughter of King Harald and Queen Sonja, gave up the title of &#8216;royal highness&#8217; upon her 2002 marriage to writer Ari, and has a reputation for not standing on ceremony.<br />
  Bye.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Laymen&#8217;s Rules for Good Beer by Russ</title>
		<link>http://epiphaniesofacommonman.com/blog/archives/45/comment-page-1#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 12:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://epiphaniesofacommonman.com/blog/?p=45#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Excellent. I would have to add to #1 that if I can sse through it I won&#039;t like it.  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent. I would have to add to #1 that if I can sse through it I won&#8217;t like it.  <img src='http://epiphaniesofacommonman.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Laymen&#8217;s Rules for Good Beer by Andrew</title>
		<link>http://epiphaniesofacommonman.com/blog/archives/45/comment-page-1#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 18:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://epiphaniesofacommonman.com/blog/?p=45#comment-13</guid>
		<description>haha! Amen!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha! Amen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What Youth Ministry Isn&#8217;t by Haley</title>
		<link>http://epiphaniesofacommonman.com/blog/archives/114/comment-page-1#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Haley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 21:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://epiphaniesofacommonman.com/blog/?p=114#comment-12</guid>
		<description>That is incredibly frightening.  Excitement as gospel.  Yikes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is incredibly frightening.  Excitement as gospel.  Yikes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is Heresy? by Jason</title>
		<link>http://epiphaniesofacommonman.com/blog/archives/171/comment-page-1#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 01:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://epiphaniesofacommonman.com/blog/?p=171#comment-9</guid>
		<description>I have moved from Arminianism to Calvinism. The two sides have thrown the word heretic at each other. It seems to be how the Scripture is interpreted and what Scriptures are given greater emphasis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have moved from Arminianism to Calvinism. The two sides have thrown the word heretic at each other. It seems to be how the Scripture is interpreted and what Scriptures are given greater emphasis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
